Pennsylvania energy advisory and savings.

A Southeastern Pennsylvania commercial building on PECO GS (general service) had grown into a demand profile that fit PD (primary distribution, demand-metered). The schedule election produced a structural reduction in the delivery component. Pennsylvania's deregulated supply market meant the supply side was unaffected; the optimization lived entirely on the PECO delivery side.

A Central Pennsylvania food processor had never filed Pennsylvania REV-1220 for its electric and gas service. A utility study quantified the qualifying manufacturing usage. The exemption certificates went in; back-credit recovery on prior overpayments covered roughly 36 months under the applicable statute.

A Pittsburgh-area manufacturing campus had 900 kW of dispatchable production load (variable line scheduling, HVAC setback in office portions, parking lot lighting) and had never enrolled in PJM capacity. Enrollment through an aggregator produced monthly capacity payments tied to the auction clearing price. Two to three dispatch events per year on average; production scheduling absorbed curtailment cleanly.

A Philadelphia commercial office had completed a building automation system retrocommissioning project the prior year without filing for the PECO retrocommissioning incentive. The Act 129 program permits late application within a defined window. The filing recovered roughly $0.06 per kWh of documented savings on the completed project.